Weblog

Tuesday, 19 August 2008

  • 劉翔

    友人説把劉翔退賽弄得像悼念特輯一様, 實在有点貽笑大方
    然而, 昨天在看電視直播時, 看著劉翔走進更衣室那一刻的感覺就像看著飛機撞上双子大廈一様, 簡直難以置信
    拿不到牌, 被Robles撃敗, 初賽被淘汰, 甚至被取消資格這些都想像得到, 偏偏這個結局真是意想不到
    埋葬的不單是那個走在黑人前面的黃種人, 還有整個中國的驕傲
    蘋果日報用'毀滅'希望, 這個詞語很啜核
    讀賣新聞標題'亞洲巨龍還沒有飛上天就掉到地上來了’
    翔龍還会飛嗎? 背上那双是十三億的翅膀, 還是更重的擔子?

Monday, 14 April 2008

  • Out of Pace

    While we have been enlightened by the power of IT/IS changing our world, i was like being challenged deeply to my faith and stunned when i met 2 of my friends last week. I was walking down the street in the morning after having a nice cup of coffee and a beautifully baked scone. Then I came to a huge pile of boxes which got into my way, two silhouettes were busy loading those boxes into the cabinet at the back of a taxi. I then realized the silhouette were actually friends of mine, a speech therapist and a civil engineer helping the speech guy with the physical exercise. The speech guy was having a new office nearby a month ago and i was wondering if his new business screwed up that soon? I was almost going to comfort him by all means. Yet the truth was they were going to the post office and those 'cargoes' were actually hundreds of pages of proposal, which the speech guy was going to send to schools and centers for children.

    I was amazed and really surprised they were spending and had to pay so much effort in an early morning trying to let someone to know his ideas. I asked them why they didn’t simply send out emails to targeted schools or centers, which should be more (cost-) effective and saving some of the trees for our children. They threw me back a stunning answer: “you are not a business guy and you are not gonna understand how business work, no one would read emails, they are presumably junked; while papers are more sustainable and they are to be read one day as long as papers are physically there. The situation is more or less the same in other business, civil engineering is of course no different. Hole, you are really out of pace.”I couldn’t tell anything, not even a single word from my MIS memories. I was really confused (and I m still confused now) digesting their words, yes I admit it I m no business guy, yet am I really that out of pace? 

    Maybe Seenu can tell me.

Saturday, 05 April 2008

  • Strategic alignment

    The strategic alignment model (Henderson & Venkatraman, 1992) describes particular components of a business strategy to which an aligned IT strategy is a valuable partner: 
     (figure from Robert's ppt)
    It is also a useful tool for an enterprise to assess its organizational structure and the strategic planning throughout the integration process, and to avoid disconnection between organizational and IS/IT strategic planning.
    Referring to the figure above, in my opinion, it is possible for the enterprise to have the strategic alignment process originated from any of the four corners, which depends on the contemporary and on going business perspective, and the current level of (both organisational and IS/IT) structural maturity, while the whole process and the whole framework would be governed and supported by the core competencies of the enterprise.
    Furthermore, the enterprise is also seeking to add value to the customer in a way that is unique and outshines the competition and that has information technologies as integral elements. Curtins (1996) defined it as the "Distinctive Competencies" of the IS/IT in the strategic alignment process.
    A modified Strategic Alignment Model is illustrated below:

    Therefore rather than to align orgnizational with IS/IT strategy, it is more important to align the core competencies of the company with the distinctive competencies of the IS/IT, which do they play an important role to determine whether to initiate strategy alignment and to prioritize the key components of the process. The McFarlan's Strategic Grid (1983) then becomes a useful tool to diagnose the role of IS/IT of the company. Taking my current company as an example, a private hospital whose core competencies are providing superior quality services, excellence in health care, and leading the market with a recognized brand name; and in which the IS/IT would fit more likely into the 'support grid' of the quadrant and is seeming to move within the map to the grid'. But the questions become 'how fast and how far is the move from the "support" to the "turnaround" going to be? (or the directors willing to be?) The answers would be traceable in the Strategic Alignment Model.
     



    P.S. I remember the days working for my previous employer when ePR was starting to engage in daily clinical application: the consultation time for each of the patients was lengthened, sounds nice huh? However the truth was that my physician colleagues were spending most of the time sticking their eyes to the PC monitor and kept typing unfamiliarly on the keyboard.

Wednesday, 02 April 2008

  • Information System for Health Care in Hong Kong

    Like most other sectors of the economy,health care has benefited enormously from IT. IT plays a major role inimproving the nature and quality of services rendered and in enhancing theefficiency and effectiveness of internal operations of health care providers.Health care providers were however slow to adopt IT when compared toorganizations in other sectors. Over the past two decades, there has been arapid increase in awareness and deployment of IT applications in the context ofhealth care.


    “Now medical errors and theneed for Physician Order Entry are touted as the next tipping point.” - Berner et al, JAMIA 12(1):3-7


    Recentreports by HIMSS suggest that a medium-sized health care providermay have approximately 90 different IT applications to handle various clinicaland non-clinical processes.


    In the US, a nationwide standardizedelectronic health records infrastructure would save US$77billion annually(Health Affairs, 2005). How about in Hong Kong? In Hong Kong 24% of primary care and 93% of secondary and tertiarycare are provided by the public sector –The HospitalAuthority (HA). The Hospital Authority,being the largest healthcare provider in Hong Kong (43 hospitals, 45 specialistclinics, 74 general clinics), has collected clinical data on patients under itscare through its integrated clinical information system over the past years andestablished a patient-centered, lifelong longitudinal clinical data repository,namely the electronic-Patient Record (ePR).

    Development of the ePR

    1990 – “GreenFields” the adoption of Computerized Patient Record (CPR)

    1991 – Patient admission

    1992 –Pharmacy system

    1993 – Labresults online

    1994 –Radiology information system

    1995 –Clinical Management System

    Direct clinician documentation and order entry

    2000 – CMSPhase II

    Electronic Patient Record (ePR)

    2003 –eSARS, eFlu, Notifiable Disease & Outbreak Reporting Syste, (NDORS)

    2004 – ePRImage Distribution

    2006 to now– PPI ePR sharing pilot project

    From CPR to ePR

    CPR is asystem containing patient centric, electronically maintained information aboutan individual’s health status, and care focusing on target events and tasks, directlyrelated to patient care and optimized for clinicians use .And enterprise CPR isan integrated, but not interfaced system, whose functionalities encompassesacute clinical care settings (e.g. individual hospital CMS). ePR is a synchronized,aggregated, longitudinal and life long patient record across all HA hospitals.Collection of replicated and standardized patient information from different HAhospitals and clinics. It also supports direct patient care, integratedoperational system, knowledge management, clinical decision support, clinicaldocumentation, clinical auditing...etc. ePR is having 12,000 users, processingup to 280,000 transactions of 90,000 patients daily.

    This is how the ePR interface looks like: (source)


    Lab results are standardized and available for inter-hospital/clinicreview: (source)


    CT images are available as soon as it is filmed and reports are also availableand archived for reference: (source)


    Medications checking for doctors during prescription and counter-alertfor allergic history: (source)

     


    Benefits from ePR

    According to Cheung (2006), the ePR can contribute in four aspects:

    Patients

    • Having their whole record available at point of care for more accurate and timelyclinical decisions
    • No need for repeated tests
    • Better quality care through clinical decision support at point of care

    Clinicians

    • More efficient clinical practice - no need to search for information and forms
    • Better decision-making with comprehensive information
    • Avoid errors associated with paper records

    The organization

    • Better use of resources
    • Data for planning, research and management
    • Implicationsto Hong Kong
    • Cost savings in annually medical health care expenditure
    • Risk management (e.g. SARS)
    • Infection control (e.g. pandemic flu, norovirus outbreak)

    PPI-ePR 

    Infectioncontrol

    Everyone shouldnever forget the period of SARS in 2003, which was a nightmare and one of thehardest times for every one of us in our life - lives were taken away day byday by unknown hands. How could ePR participate in defending us during that periodof time?

    eSARS(2003) - realtime capture of SARS suspects and cases, and realtime acknowledge tothe Department of Health (then to WHO), the police department, and to academicbodies (i.e. the HKU and CUHK faculty of medicine and department ofmicrobiology).

    (source)

     

    And more now:

    eFlu – electronicreporting of suspected or confirmed avian and pandemic flu cases in real time

    NDORS(Notifiable Disease & Outbreak Reporting System) – electronic reporting ofall notifiable diseases including documentation in HA CMS for hospitals and clinics. (e.g. CA-MRSA)


    ePR On the Move – the PPI-ePR

    The Public Private Interface - electronicPatient Record Sharing Pilot System

    (PPI-ePR), which has been launched since 2006, is an online informationsystem aiming at improving the sharing of patient’s clinical informationbetween public and private healthcare providers to facilitate a seamless andbetter quality healthcare environment for patients in Hong Kong. The HA will proactively share the ePR of patients who are under thecare of selected private healthcare providers upon patients’ consent. The pilotproject is being boosted this year together with the health care reform policy.

     

    Time to move

    As an ex-user of the ePR system, to be honest, i found this is remarkably one out the few successes archieved by my ex-employer - the HA. I can remember the days before the ePR was adopted and was generally implemented, data retrieval and communications were messy.  Documents and papers, making and receiving phone calls were the only communication means, and they did consume most of our time doing papers work and actually affected the quantity and quality of our effort to our patients.
    The situation now in my current employer (in the private sector) is more like those old days when ePR hadn't launched: patient histories were never complete, tests results and appointments were never ontime. It is funny (and sad) that we do have the latest IT, latest equipments, unlimited fund, and an IT department too, yet the computers in our clinics are doing simple copying and scanning; the X-ray would never know what is going on in the Ultrasound; nurses would never know where do the patients' blood samples go...
    Can we learn from the ePR? We know that it could be our managerial problem rather than the IT guys fault. But obviously from time to time when things got stuck, the IT is the one to be blamed. This year, the government is putting a lot of efforts fostering the PPI-ePR program. The opportunity is there. Directors, please wake up.

           

Monday, 31 March 2008

  • Virtual team and online games

    Virtual team is interesting. Since many of the examples saying that a virtual team is easy to establish but difficult to manage and ends up with failure (see this example of my friend), while some of them are very successful example of a virtual team. And in which "Trust" seems to be the key to success. However it is interesting that how do we develop trust among the individuals and make it sustainable throughout the process, for which the players do not even know each other at all? And how would one define this kind of "trust"?

    Virtual Trust in a Virtual Team
    While Pettit (2004)
    argues that trust between virtual strangers is impossible; many people argue that “virtual trust” is the same as trust in the real live. I am not quite agreeing with them, they are like two extremes towards the trust continuum. When Robert raised the issue virtual team in the class, I could think of online games at once. Remember two to three years ago. I was very keen on playing online games, where my virtual teammates were usually from other places of the world, there were from Japan, Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, France, Canada, the US, and Mainland China of course. We had all the characteristics of a virtual team: We had never met or even never knew each other before and there weren’t any physical contacts at all. We were living in different time zones, speaking different mother languages, and of different cultures. And yet we have been together most of the time exploring the virtual world. 

    My point is do we really have to trust each other when forming a virtual team? I suggest to some extend “virtual trust” does contribute to bringing a team together or enhancing a more cohesive virtual team. On the other hand, does this kind of “virtual trust” necessarily equal to (or close to) the trust in our real live? Moreover, “virtual trust” can be absent for a virtual team to function properly or even efficiently. Provided that:

    -         the individual players are skillful and strong enough, despite the size of the team

    -         the communication is effective

    -         a strong leader

    -         a clearly defined role for each of the players

    -         a perspicacious strategic planning

    -         a common goal

    Goal Oriented
    To me I do believe a common goal is the most important successful criterion for a virtual team, according to my past experience in online games (as most of the games are set to be tasks oriented). When all the players are striving for the same goal: accomplish the missions, defeating an insane boss, or hunting a precious treasure. The virtual team can be very synergistic. (To be honest, most of the time a virtual team is formed only when there is a common goal and the task cannot be done alone, e.g. killing an insane boss, and the team will be disbanded as soon as the goal is achieved.) Is this situation similar to our real world? You may argue that virtual teams for online games are more like an “Interest Group” rather than a “T
    ask Group”. But the focus should be on the ultimate goal and not just task by task.

       

Top Tags - Weblog

[no tags]

Holeerf

  • Visit Holeerf's Xanga Site
    • Name: Hole
    • Gender: Male
    • Member Since: 12/21/2007

Weblog Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

About Me

[no info]

Pulse

Holeerf has no pulse!...